Civic-EP2.co.uk
February 16, 2012, 07:20:15 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF version updated
Any issues with deleted accounts please let me know.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Window Tinting Rules  (Read 7365 times)
EP2
Senior
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 333



View Profile
« on: March 03, 2007, 08:37:36 PM »

The Window tinting Regulation was amended from 1st January 2004.

CLICK HERE to watch our short video explaining the UK window tinting regulation.

This Regulation amendment now clearly rules out any tinted films being applied to driver windows (Front doors).

The Regulation states 70% of visible light must pass through the drivers windows including any other substrate fitted to the glass. Many people misunderstand the regulation and presume that 70% allows a 30% tint - It doesn't! Glass does not let in 100% of light. Clear glass only allows approximately 86% of light to pass & the slight tint of standard manufactured glass varies from the 70% maximum limit up to approx 80% of light passing through, thus any film being applied to these windows will drop the light transmissions to below the regulation limit.

If your front windows are tinted to any level you do risk being stopped by either Traffic Police or VOSA (Vehicle & Operator Services Agency) they have light meters to test the light that passes through your glass. If you have a subtle tint fitted then you should just be asked for it to be removed, if you have dark front door windows you could be told you
cant drive your car any further and face a fine and points on your licence!

Window tinting is classed as a vehicle modification so you should inform your vehicle insurer also. Do be aware that if you have your front door windows tinted and you have an accident, it could possibly be a get out clause for your insurance company?


Regulation in detail...


Window Tinting - Amendments to legislation

During the early part of 2004, Section 32 of the Road Vehicles (Construction & Use) Regulations will be amended to include "Window Tint Films" where such materials attached to the glass are capable of reducing the visible light transmission of forward windows to below prescribed levels (70% VLT for front side windows). These changes will be back-dated to become applicable from 1st January 2004.

This will effectively ban the practice in future of applying virtually any tinted films to windows forward of the B-Post on any vehicle that is to be driven on UK roads.

The reasons for these changes is the recent proliferation of vehicles that are excessively tinted. Some vehicles may be so heavily tinted that they present a real danger when used on public roads. The action being taken by the Government follows a fatality that occurred recently where a heavily tinted car was involved in a collision with a motorcycle and the window tints were held to blame due to the vision of the driver being impaired.

There is, however, a recognized difference between "light window tints" which may be considered safe for road use and "excessively dark window tints" which are not.

There has also been a great deal of debate in recent years about the legitimacy of window tints that do not obscure the vision of the driver. A clear case has been argued that road-safe window tints do not actually conflict with existing regulations. The Department of Transport have argued however, that Section 32 was always intended to cover materials attached to the glass, despite the fact that no mention of this is made in the Regulation itself. The only solution remaining would be to amend the Legislation.

Consequently and in order to clarify the solution the Government have finally decided to up-date the Regulations to specifically include Tinted Films since, in the view of the Police and the Department of Transport, this is the only way in which the problems of excessive tints can be remedied.

Unfortunately however, even tint films that maybe considered to be safe for road use will now be viewed as in conflict with the Regulations, enabling the Police and Vehicle Inspectorate to take action against vehicle owners.

This has significant implications for the owners of vehicles that have window tints and also those that are responsible for installing or selling window tints.

Implications for the Installer and Motor Retailer.

From when the amendments to Section 32 come into force, any Motor Retailer that sells a vehicle that has window tint films applied which reduce visible light transmission levels to below prescribed levels forward of the B-Post is committing an offence and runs the risk of prosecution under Section 75 of the 1988 Road Traffic Act with reference to Section 41 (which defers to Construction and Use Regulations).

In a similar way, anyone responsible for the fitment of window tints which reduce visible light transmission level to below prescribed levels on windows forward of the B-Post is committing an offence and can also be prosecuted under Section 76 of the 1988 Road Traffic Act.

Implications for the vehicle owner.

After much discussion, a sympathetic Enforcement Policy has been agreed between the Department of Transport and The Glass and Glazing Federation to ensure that all vehicle owners that have had tints applied in the past may be dealt with fairly. This applies in particular where the infringement is with respect to tints that do not pose a significant threat to Road Safety, despite being in contravention with the amended Regulations.

In any event, after the date of the amendment to Section 32, the owner of the vehicle that has window tints applied forward of the B-Post is liable to be challenged by either a Police Officer or by an Inspector from the Department of Transport Vehicle Inspectorate, where their vehicle is noticed being driven on Public Roads.

Where such a vehicle is stopped and the window tints applied are such that the visible light transmission level, when measured using an appropriate device, falls to below prescribed levels, the following enforcement guidelines have been agreed with and recommended by the Government.

Above 30% Visible Light Transmission (Less Severe Window Tints).

The owner or driver of such a vehicle will be required to have the tinted film removed from the windows under the direction of either a Rectification Notice or a Delayed Prohibition Notice, A period of grace will apply for a limited number of days (normally ten) during which time the vehicle may be driven whilst the rectification work is to be completed. In either case, the vehicle will need to be inspected by either a Police Officer or Vehicle Inspectorate Officer to confirm that the glass has been restored to a compliant condition. Prosecution is unlikely in such circumstances provided the vehicle owner complies fully.

Below 30% Visible Light Transmission (Excessively dark Window Tints)

The owner or driver of such a vehicle may be issued with an Immediate Prohibition Notice and immediately
prevented from driving the vehicle on public roads until the tints have been removed and either a Police Officer or Vehicle Inspectorate Officer confirms that the glass has been restored to a compliant condition. It is also possible, depending on the severity of the offence, that the owner may be prosecuted for driving a vehicle in a non-roadworthy or even a dangerous condition with the potential for Penalty Points and a Fine.

Driving such a vehicle on public roads before the tints have been removed and before a Prohibition Notice has been lifted will be a serious offence and the owner or driver is likely to be prosecuted.

Action that needs to be taken by the Window Tint Installer and Motor Retailer.

Restrictions - From the beginning of 2004, all customers of a Window Tint Installer or a Motor Retailer that enquire about window tinting should be informed about the new Regulations. It will be unlawful to sell them a vehicle that has tints applied toward of the B-Post and may render the Tinter or Retailer liable to prosecution. The vehicle may also be deemed to be in a Non-Roadworthy condition leaving the owner liable to prosecution as well.

The owner of a vehicle that is in a non-roadworthy condition may find that they void their Insurance Cover if they continue to drive it on public roads. In the event of an accident, the Insurance Company may refuse to pay part or all of their claim.

Rectification - All Window Tint Installers and Motor Retailers that have supplied window tints toward of the B-Post are being asked by the Government and the Glass and Glazing Federation to contact all of their previous customers wherever possible, to inform them of the changes to Legislation and to offer them a chance to have their vehicle returned to have the front tints removed.

This is most important since this will give every customer a chance to become informed about the amendments to the Regulations whilst being able to change their vehicle into a compliant condition before they may be challenged in the future by a Policeman or an officer from the Vehicle Inspectorate.

Note: Tinted windows are not included in the MOT test (Yet), but the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) have started roadside checks to make sure tinted windows follow the Road Vehicle (Construction & Use) Regulations. This regulation, as detailed above, specifies the minimum levels of light that must pass through the windscreen and front side windows.
Logged

img]http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i35/d34n666/ep2-white.png[/img]
sniper
Expert
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 728



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2007, 10:13:21 PM »

Informant post! We have to be kept upto date on things like this!
I can't see why they are making such a fuss over tinted windows though?! And I seriously doubt the accident with the motorcycle was due to dark tints! More likely it was because the driver either wasn't looking properly, or the motorcyclist may have been driving inappropriately. I've seen this happen before!
And if window tints are to become illegal, is driving with sunglasses on to be made illegal too? It's the same concept, just it's the lenses that are tinted and not the car windows. Cool
I suppose it's something else to piss off drivers and make more money from us!
Why is the Government so anti-motorist?! :roll:
Logged
Elfman
Global Moderator
Expert
*****

Karma: 2
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2007, 12:34:36 AM »

im getting 35% all around inc front, you reackon that would be minor tints?
Logged

sniper
Expert
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 728



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2007, 11:31:46 AM »

Well, this is another point! If the rear 3 were 100% and the front 2 only slightly tinted, then that would reduce the light more in the car than if all the windows were all slightly tinted. So the front windows would technically be illegal, but the over all light let into the car would probably still be safely within the limits.
Also, 100% on the back 3 looks dodgy to me now, as you're only allowed slight tints on the front it doesn't flow from the back to the front very well. IMO anyway.
Logged
Civic_Vtec
Global Moderator
Expert
*****

Karma: 0
Posts: 1144



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2007, 11:44:54 AM »

Worthy of a sticky yes.
Logged

1999-MB6
2005-EV1
2001-EP2
Halfloaf
Administrator
Expert
*****

Karma: 5
Posts: 913



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2007, 12:09:02 PM »

Excellent Post.
Logged

Gav@evolutionice.com
Junior
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 139


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2007, 12:36:21 PM »

If the front side windows have a marking on them which says (AS2) then your windows are already at the maximum level for tinting. ANY tint applied to these will be illegal.

I dont know about the UK but in Scotland the law has been like this for ages. If you get caught then the police can make you take the tint off there and then otherwise they will put a prohibition notice on your car which means you cannot drive it anywhere until the tints are removed.
Logged
Shaggy69uk
Expert
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 471



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2007, 10:29:34 AM »

As some of you may know i have been in this situation before. I had a tint all round on my Sport and got stopped with the police who had a light meter. I didnt get ordered to take the tint off there and then, they gave me 14 days to do this then i had to take it to VOSA to test it again. Anyways i now have my accord tinted ALL ROUND again


YIPEE!!!! Bring on the cops!!!!

 Tongue
Logged

img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y149/shaggyshaw/23456.jpg[/img]
Gav@evolutionice.com
Junior
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 139


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2007, 05:11:27 PM »

From what i have heard, there is a new law about to be enforced that means you will receive 3 points and a 60 quid fine if your front windows are tinted above the legal limit. It is liable to be an extension to the current law which also caters for tyres, lights etc. That means you could be in line to get a fine "per window"..
Logged
Paddy_2006
Junior
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 194



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2007, 09:29:24 AM »

3 points can only be issued if the tints are dark. If they are slightly smoked you will receive a £30 fine. Most police are okay with tints on the front as long as they are very light (around my area anyway).

Sayin that i never had any trouble with my saxo and they were really dark compared to my civic
Logged

recognition
Just Started
*

Karma: 0
Posts: 16


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2007, 10:58:16 AM »

So this law has been back dated to 1st Jan 2004?

I had my dark smoke tints done all round in 2002.  I still have the reciept proving the date.  Am I exempt?! Wink
Logged
Elfman
Global Moderator
Expert
*****

Karma: 2
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2007, 04:28:43 PM »

lol who knows mate.. ive had mine done near enough a year now and havent had any bother what so ever.
Logged

Jay
Guest
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2008, 10:16:17 AM »

so what is the perfect tint? ha hard question, i want the same level alll round from front to back so wht tint would be the best for looks an safety with the coppers creepin bout
Logged
crazy-steff
Junior
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 136



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2008, 09:45:48 PM »

ye what is the perfect tint as i think it looks silly withought all of the windows done, and having the same type of tint all around dose look better??
Logged

Civic EP2 2005
Black 17" aerospeed's
BMC type filter
Aero Wipers
Pioneer head unit
Pioneer TS-G1702i speakers
4-1 Manifold
EBC Turbo groove disks + ultimax pads, all around
Civic type R spoiler
Front upper strut-brace
Rear Tints
Jazz washer jet
shjdak24
Expert
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 891


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 07, 2011, 06:42:41 AM »

#\u624B\u673A\u591A\u529F\u80FD\u5B9A\u4F4D\u76D1\u542C\u5361shoujidingweiqi.org.txt.published
#Sat Apr 16 12:50:03 CST 2011
pro_time=1
pro_package=手机多功能定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
page=
pro_unit=1
pro_userprice2=0
pro_ormat=手机多功能定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
bigcatid=0
pro_allcounts=1
content=
每月新增手机用户过千万,目前印度手机用户已经超过4亿户
\r\n1541万、1382万、1564万,这仅仅是印度今年1月~3月新增手机用户的数字.这种暴发性增加的势头还在连续.
\r\n"很难估计印度手机用户到今年底会膨胀到什么田地.但守旧估量,当初印度手机用户已经超过4亿."恰是基于印度手机市场的狂热,深圳华禹总经理赵志新从去年下半年开端,就频频飞往印度.
\r\n华禹已经在印度的德里、孟买、清奈和加尔格达四个大城市树立了当地公司,手机窃听卡的原理,并打造了当地品牌HZtel跟WPtel,每月出口印度的手机销量已经超过20万部.
\r\n印度手机市场疯狂膨胀,吸引的不仅仅是赵志新,包含山寨机厂家在内的全部中国手机军团都猖狂涌向印度市场淘金.
\r\n或者正是基于此,6月17日,印度对外商业总局局长公然对外表现,将对入口手机进行更加严厉的品质限度,但凡不IMEI码(俗称"机身码")的手机都不得在印度销售.
\r\n血腥的价钱战
\r\n"今年以来,中国山寨手机对印度手机市场冲击很大."上周末才刚从印度回国的康佳通讯海外营销部总经理范东华对CBN记者表示.
\r\n
\r\n
你想知道他她的通话内容吗?手机监听卡轻易监听贸易机密 ,短信拦截,手机定位,通话录音,无所不包,是你婚外情,官司纠纷,婚姻问题,官场竞争,手机监听卡,所有皆知
\r\n
广东东莞樟木头专业销售手机监听卡 定位器免费货到付款 网站www.jiantingka.org
\r\n
2011最新版手机监听卡,采用国际当先技能,跟踪定位器,专业SIRF第四代卫星导航芯片,免费手机定位器,8通道快速监听,谁有买手机监听卡,卫星追踪,手机窃.听器软件,定位正确度在3米之内,同时能够监控18部无线电手机,搜查监听,信号拦阻,速度跟准确率是金榜题名的,电话监听卡软件。本产品的三维电子地图是2011年最新版本的
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
 
\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
pro_mincounts=1
pro_madeplace=手机多功能定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
pro_saleway=手机多功能定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
pro_name=手机多功能定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
pro_keyword=手机多功效定位监听卡shoujidingweiqi.org
act=doadd
pro_price=1
smallcatid=0
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!